Different PUA's have very different views regarding the correct way to approach a girl and it still seems to be about a 50/50 split in terms of 'direct' vs 'indirect'
They are each very adamant about their way being the best.
Some coaches claim direct game is only for good looking dudes.
Others claim that direct game can work for ugly dudes aswell, because the very act of being direct shows confidence and thus 'creates' attraction in the girl
Some claim you need to be very indirect and aloof and not show interest in her until she does first, and even then, you need to pretend that your interest in her is based on her behaviour rather than her looks
Some claim that they used indirect for years, and were shocked at the increase in their success when they decided too adopt much more direct game
Some say ''going direct isn't even game''. Pure 'fools mate' and that indirect is the only way
Some claim to get great success from VERY direct game such as the 'shock and awe' method where you spend the whole interaction almost as if you are super taken aback by her beauty - The idea being that girls get turned on by 'desire'
Lets agree that a male model should probably always go direct since with such good looks, he can get almost any girl without using any 'game' whatsoever.
But for the case of a regular dude, cold approaching in maybe a bar, do you have particularly strong views EITHER WAY In terms of whether direct or indirect is superior?
Also, to be clear, for the purpose of this thread, i'm basically saying 'direct' = opening a girl and telling her you think she's attractive, basically.
I tend to mix it around. I'll go indirect most of the night and when it's getting very late, i'll throw a few hail mary's and do a few very direct opens.
I'm in the UK for what it's worth
I'd be interested to hear what your opens look like, and if you wouldn't mind, a little bit about how you 'follow them up' in order to kind of 'hook' them after a minute or so.
They are each very adamant about their way being the best.
Some coaches claim direct game is only for good looking dudes.
Others claim that direct game can work for ugly dudes aswell, because the very act of being direct shows confidence and thus 'creates' attraction in the girl
Some claim you need to be very indirect and aloof and not show interest in her until she does first, and even then, you need to pretend that your interest in her is based on her behaviour rather than her looks
Some claim that they used indirect for years, and were shocked at the increase in their success when they decided too adopt much more direct game
Some say ''going direct isn't even game''. Pure 'fools mate' and that indirect is the only way
Some claim to get great success from VERY direct game such as the 'shock and awe' method where you spend the whole interaction almost as if you are super taken aback by her beauty - The idea being that girls get turned on by 'desire'
Lets agree that a male model should probably always go direct since with such good looks, he can get almost any girl without using any 'game' whatsoever.
But for the case of a regular dude, cold approaching in maybe a bar, do you have particularly strong views EITHER WAY In terms of whether direct or indirect is superior?
Also, to be clear, for the purpose of this thread, i'm basically saying 'direct' = opening a girl and telling her you think she's attractive, basically.
I tend to mix it around. I'll go indirect most of the night and when it's getting very late, i'll throw a few hail mary's and do a few very direct opens.
I'm in the UK for what it's worth
I'd be interested to hear what your opens look like, and if you wouldn't mind, a little bit about how you 'follow them up' in order to kind of 'hook' them after a minute or so.
Comment